Rueangkrai calls out to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to slam the “Cabinet” for offering “digital wallets” that may violate the law because of policy corruption.

“Ruangkrai” asks “NACC” to investigate “Cabinet” after giving green light to “Digital Wallet” indicating policy corruption. Facilitating large capital or not? Confused, following legal procedures completely. Does the BAAC have authority or not? Pointing out the new platform. Is procurement in accordance with regulations? The details are not clear.

Mr. Rueangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Phalang Pracharat Party, revealed that from following the project to top up 10,000 baht via digital wallet. that the Cabinet (Cabinet) recently passed a resolution approving on April 23, 2024, in the documents of various agencies used in consideration of the Cabinet’s resolution, there are many points of observation that should be examined.

Mr. Ruengkrai said that in the Cabinet resolution, many agencies offered opinions or observations in a way that indicated that the project still had many problems. And it may not be as the Prime Minister and ministers jointly issued a press release to the media. Considering the letter that the NACC had previously submitted to the Cabinet. went earlier with suggestions and observations from various agencies such as the Budget Office Council of State, NESDB, Bank of Thailand Digital Government Development Agency (DIA) In this case, there are reasons to ask the NACC to come and inspect the 10,000 baht top-up project via digital wallet as follows:

The Ministry of Finance and related agencies have followed the steps of the law, rules, regulations, and Cabinet resolutions. and related circulars to be correct and complete Including arranging for monitoring and evaluation of achievement. And report on the results of operations according to the said project strictly appropriate to the situation or not.

Has the Ministry of Finance taken action regarding the source of funds by implementing the project through government agencies, amounting to approximately 172,300 million baht, by assigning the BAAC to carry out the project? and is an operation within the scope of objectives and within the duties and legal powers of the BAAC in accordance with the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives Act, B.E. 2509.

In this regard, according to Section 28 of the State Fiscal Discipline Act 2018, the Ministry of Finance and BAAC must prepare a project management plan. Estimated expenses Source of funds used throughout the operation period Estimated income loss and the benefits that will be received and presented to the Cabinet for approval in details before implementing the project according to Section 27 of the Act or not?

The Ministry of Finance uses the annual budget as a source of funds for project implementation. Is it in accordance with the fiscal conditions and fiscal discipline framework of the state? Is the implementation of the project in the amount of 172,300 million baht consistent with the scope of objectives and the law establishing the agency to be operated and related laws? Have the details of the project been submitted to the Cabinet for consideration before implementation? Creating a platform for use in project operations Complies with laws and regulations related to procurement and government supplies management. and other related laws or not

The Cabinet has assigned relevant agencies to review and present additional information. As well as creating guidelines or measures to solve various problems or risks. Let it be concrete as well. Before the Cabinet considers approving the principle framework of the digital wallet project or not. If there is no assignment before the Cabinet has voted, will it be considered that the Cabinet is in violation or not complying with the relevant laws?

From the observations of the Office of the Basic Education Commission, it appears that the Cabinet passed a resolution where the criteria and conditions for designing and developing a system to support spending and payments related to Open Loop were not clear enough. The Cabinet’s resolution will be considered an offense under various laws. Related or not

Mr. Rueangkrai said that today he sent a letter via EMS mail to the NACC asking them to check whether Is the project to top up 10,000 baht via digital wallet ready to be implemented? Does the project violate the law and be considered policy corruption? Is there a hidden intention to benefit a group of large entrepreneurs? Is there any prevention of corruption according to the NACC’s recommendations? Will the Cabinet, including any government officials working together in this project, have Is there a related legal violation?