Stunned by social media! Sonthiya asks Election Commission to investigate ‘Aung Ing’ case, visits father-uncle in Singapore

Mr. Sonthiya Sawasdee said that he had come to complain to the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT). There are 2 main issues today. Issue 1, in the case of Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul Posted a message on Facebook commenting that the Progressive Party must hold on to the chairmanship. The House of Representatives must belong to the Progressive Party. which the issue of the Speaker of the House of Representatives will be with any party It is in accordance with democracy to choose one another. The Speaker of the House according to the 2017 Constitution also means the Speaker of the National Assembly, meaning that the Speaker of the House is also the President of the Senate. It is responsible for controlling the work of the President of the Senate. which is about a year old

“Therefore, the behavior of Mr. Piyabutr who is disqualified from politics Since being a campaign assistant in the past elections including posting messages in a suggestive manner It shows by inferring that the party has advanced without the executive or anyone denying it. They also spoke in the same direction. Therefore, it is assumed that It falls within the scope of the Political Party Act, Section 28, Section 29, and can lead to the dissolution of the party under Section 92 (3). and interpreted Mr. Piyabutr’s actions as a guideline Dominate the party, move far or not and how? As for considering whether to submit to the Constitutional Court or not. Ultimately, it’s up to the Election Commission to consider,” said Sonthiya.

Mr. Sonthiya said issue 2 This is the case of Ms. Pae Thongtarn Shinawatra, a candidate for the Prime Minister and the head of the family of the Pheu Thai Party, visiting Mr. Thaksin. Shinawatra and Ms. Yingluck Shinawatra in Singapore He thought that visiting his father or benefactor could be done, but now Ms. Pae Thongtarn has been appointed by the Pheu Thai Party as a prime ministerial candidate, so the behavior of the prime minister. under the provisions of the constitution On the matter of interests or any conflicts. And according to Section 45 of the Political Parties Act, which is bound to Section 92 (3), it therefore asks the Election Commission to consider whether or not Ms. Phaethongthan’s behavior is against this law. After making a decision, they may submit their petition to the Constitutional Court. in order to consider the diagnosis as a guideline for the implementation of candidates for the Prime Minister or that the Prime Minister in the future as well

“I am still confident that the party has advanced, led by Mr. Pita Limcharoenrat. Unable to go through to the process of voting as Prime Minister, then the candidate of the Pheu Thai Party, the first person, is Ms. Pae Thong Than. There are many people who came out to analyze the case of Ms. Pae Thongtarn. travel to visit father During this situation which by ethics morality and etiquette or law should not act openly which is not a problem to visit the father or benefactor But the visit during the position Or being a candidate for the Prime Minister cannot be explained in terms of conflicts of interest. In particular, Mr. Thaksin and Ms. Yingluck have already been sentenced to imprisonment by Thai courts. for all the reasons Therefore, it is the source of the request for the Election Commission to consider the actions of Ms. Pae Thongtarn, “said Mr. Sonthiya.

When asked about Mr. Pita’s media holdings, Mr. Sonthiya said the constitution did not write how much to hold. But only writes that candidates for MPs cannot have shares. therefore worrisome And Mr. Phitha has just informed the NACC. Therefore, I would like to appeal to Mr. Phitha and the Kao Klai Party. Because since the election came in with a majority Thai stock market crash Foreign shareholders withdrew nearly 100,000 million baht of their shares. with unclear

“I’m rooting for Mr. Pita. and the Progressive Party But many matters should be cleared up. Before Mr. Phitha took the position of Prime Minister because if voted as prime minister Then the Constitutional Court ruled Ready to order to stop performing duties, will not be good for the Progressive Party and the country, therefore wanting to finish this matter first, “said Sonthiya.